I was always taught that the methods section of a paper is the most important one. Glad you will be highlighting the concept of “do these study subjects look like my patients”. And I’m strictly a ARR and NNT person. Relative risk is relatively meaningless in my book (since it is a useless metric in isolation and requires the context of baseline risk….but once you consider RRR and baseline risk in combo…as you should….that’s ARR).
Looking forward to this.
I was always taught that the methods section of a paper is the most important one. Glad you will be highlighting the concept of “do these study subjects look like my patients”. And I’m strictly a ARR and NNT person. Relative risk is relatively meaningless in my book (since it is a useless metric in isolation and requires the context of baseline risk….but once you consider RRR and baseline risk in combo…as you should….that’s ARR).